Show simple item record

dc.creatorBlagojević, Doni
dc.creatorMartire, Salvatore
dc.creatorHendrickson, Cary Yungmee
dc.creatorHanzu, Mihail
dc.creatorGalante, Michael Victor
dc.creatorKahkonen, Tanja
dc.creatorPollumae, Priit
dc.creatorFontana, Veronika
dc.creatorRadtke, Anna
dc.creatorStojanovski, Vladimir
dc.creatorNedeljković, Jelena
dc.creatorPoduška, Zoran
dc.creatorStojković, Dragana
dc.creatorSanches-Pereira, Alessandro
dc.creatorSchubert, Florian
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T13:07:35Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T13:07:35Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1847-6481
dc.identifier.urihttps://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/744
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: Sustainability, sustainable development and sustainable forest management are terms that are commonly, and interchangeably used in the forest industry, however their meaning take on different connotations, relative to varying subject matter. The aim of this paper is to look at these terms in a more comprehensive way, relative to the current ideology of sustainability in forestry. Materials and Methods: This paper applies a literature review of the concepts of: i) sustainable development; ii) sustainable forest management; and iii) economic and non- economic valuation. The concepts are viewed through a historical dimension of shifting paradigms, originating from production-to service-based forestry. Values are discussed through a review of general value theory and spatial, cultural and temporal differences in valuation. Along the evolution of these concepts, we discuss their applicability as frameworks to develop operational guidelines for forest management, relative to the multi-functionality of forests. Results and Conclusions: Potential discrepancies between the conceptual origins of sustainable development and sustainable forest management are highlighted, relative to how they have been interpreted and diffused as new perceptions on forest value for the human society. We infer the current paradigm may not reflect the various dimensions adequately as its implementation is likely to be more related to the distribution of power between stakeholders, rather than the value stakeholders' place on the various forest attributes.en
dc.relationEU through the Marie Curie Initial Training Networks (ITN) action CASTLE [316020]
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceSEEFOR-South-East European Forestry
dc.subjectvalue theoryen
dc.subjectsustainable forest managementen
dc.subjectsustainabilityen
dc.subjectgovernanceen
dc.subjectforesten
dc.subjectforest policyen
dc.subjectecosystems multi-dimensionalityen
dc.titleMaking Forest Values Work: Enhancing Multi-Dimensional Perspectives towards Sustainable Forest Managementen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage8
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.other7(1): 1-8
dc.citation.spage1
dc.citation.volume7
dc.identifier.doi10.15177/seefor.16-01
dc.identifier.fulltextomorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/909/741.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_1284
dc.identifier.wos000406980900001
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record