Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorMariotti, Barbara
dc.creatorOliet, Juan A.
dc.creatorAndivia, Enrique
dc.creatorTsakaldimi, Marianthi
dc.creatorVillar-Salvador, Pedro
dc.creatorIvetić, Vladan
dc.creatorMontagnoli, Antonio
dc.creatorKerkez-Janković, Ivona
dc.creatorBilir, Nebi
dc.creatorBohlenius, Henrik
dc.creatorCvjetković, Branislav
dc.creatorDumins, Karlis
dc.creatorHeiskanen, Juha
dc.creatorHinkov, Georgi
dc.creatorFloistad, Inger Sundheim
dc.creatorCocozza, Claudia
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T14:17:24Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T14:17:24Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2198-6436
dc.identifier.urihttps://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1401
dc.description.abstractPurpose of Review The demand for forest tree seedlings is increasing globally, and Sphagnum peat moss is widely used as a component of growing media for container plant production. However, peat extraction is environmentally unsustainable. The forest nursery sector needs to switch to more sustainable alternatives to peat. This review aims to identify potential substitutes for peat by reviewing the worldwide literature on alternative materials for growing media in forest nurseries. Recent Findings Most studies on alternative growing media focused on single plant species growing under local conditions, thereby limiting generalizations about the effectiveness of alternative materials for plant production. To our knowledge, no systematic reviews of scientific literature on the effectiveness of new, alternative-to-peat materials for enhancing plant growth and the associated growing media characteristics for the forest nursery sector are currently available. Summary Most of the analyzed case studies focused on angiosperms (73.1%), with the majority of studies coming from tropical seasonal forests/savannas (36.5%), followed by woodlands/shrublands (31.6%), and temperate forests (15.0%) biomes. Compost was the most studied material (19.5%), followed by bark, other organic materials, and manure (9.8, 9.7, and 8.0%, respectively). Green and municipal wastes were the principal sources of compost ( gt 60%), while agriculture and green wastes were the first sources of other materials ( gt 90%). Tested materials were dependent on the geographic region. Thus, manure was the most tested material in Africa and South America, tree bark in North America, and compost in Europe, Asia, and Oceania. Alternative materials effectively provided optimal physicochemical characteristics of growing media and enhanced seedling nursery growth when compared with peat-based growing media in more than 60% of the case studies. This review helps to identify research gaps and, most importantly, provides the basis for the future application of alternative growing media materials in forest nursery management worldwide.en
dc.relationThis article is based upon the work of Work Group 3 "Quality matters!" within the COST Action CA19128 PEN-CAFoRR-Pan-European Network for Climate Adaptive Forest Restoration and Reforestation - supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technol
dc.relationCOST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceCurrent Forestry Reports
dc.subjectSubstrateen
dc.subjectSeedling productionen
dc.subjectRestorationen
dc.subjectPeat substitutionen
dc.subjectOrganic waste recyclingen
dc.subjectForest nurseryen
dc.subjectEnvironmental sustainabilityen
dc.titleA Global Review on Innovative, Sustainable, and Effective Materials Composing Growing Media for Forest Seedling Productionen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage428
dc.citation.issue6
dc.citation.other9(6): 413-428
dc.citation.spage413
dc.citation.volume9
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40725-023-00204-2
dc.identifier.rcubconv_1736
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174927800
dc.identifier.wos001089654800001
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу