TY  - CONF
AU  - Đorđević, Dejan
AU  - Vasiljević, Nevena
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/888
AB  - With the transition, spatial planning was supposed to mitigate the negative effects of the new player - market to the public interest. But, seems like our planning didn't find the mechanisms to mitigate those effects created by the market inside it. Planning institutions in pretransitional period were exclusively in public sector. We now have on one side, some big planning institution, partially financed from the state's budget usually with the monopoly over elaboration of one group of plans and on the other side, smaller ones which are being privatized. Both are thrown to the market and are trying to acquire as much engagements as possible in order to secure enough financing. They are producing more plans for less money in a shorter period of time. As a result, these former public agents diverted by the new hostile conditions given by undeveloped market and neoliberal environment are still presenting traditional rigid planning model, deterministic and inflexible, with fixed land use parameters and regulations. Seems like the turbulent times in which the most important task is to survive didn't give them a chance to develop and to introduce more innovative and novel models in view of participative, strategic and action plan oriented planning. The failure of planning enterprise to achieve at least some balance in regional inequity is clearly visible in peripheral, i.e. border areas. The paper discuss the main objectives and planning concepts in various overlapping planning documents on national, regional and local levels elaborated for Timocka krajina, a border region situated in NE Serbia towards a frontier to Bulgaria, and the obvious gap between planning optimism and accurate demographic, social and economic decline of the region, despite both local and European based, mostly cross border related projects and initiatives.
C3  - 3rd International Scientific Conference Geobalcanica 2017
T1  - The failure of planning endevour in north east border area of Serbia towards Bulgaria
EP  - 102
SP  - 95
DO  - 10.18509/GBP.2017.13
UR  - conv_1428
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đorđević, Dejan and Vasiljević, Nevena",
year = "2017",
abstract = "With the transition, spatial planning was supposed to mitigate the negative effects of the new player - market to the public interest. But, seems like our planning didn't find the mechanisms to mitigate those effects created by the market inside it. Planning institutions in pretransitional period were exclusively in public sector. We now have on one side, some big planning institution, partially financed from the state's budget usually with the monopoly over elaboration of one group of plans and on the other side, smaller ones which are being privatized. Both are thrown to the market and are trying to acquire as much engagements as possible in order to secure enough financing. They are producing more plans for less money in a shorter period of time. As a result, these former public agents diverted by the new hostile conditions given by undeveloped market and neoliberal environment are still presenting traditional rigid planning model, deterministic and inflexible, with fixed land use parameters and regulations. Seems like the turbulent times in which the most important task is to survive didn't give them a chance to develop and to introduce more innovative and novel models in view of participative, strategic and action plan oriented planning. The failure of planning enterprise to achieve at least some balance in regional inequity is clearly visible in peripheral, i.e. border areas. The paper discuss the main objectives and planning concepts in various overlapping planning documents on national, regional and local levels elaborated for Timocka krajina, a border region situated in NE Serbia towards a frontier to Bulgaria, and the obvious gap between planning optimism and accurate demographic, social and economic decline of the region, despite both local and European based, mostly cross border related projects and initiatives.",
journal = "3rd International Scientific Conference Geobalcanica 2017",
title = "The failure of planning endevour in north east border area of Serbia towards Bulgaria",
pages = "102-95",
doi = "10.18509/GBP.2017.13",
url = "conv_1428"
}

Đorđević, D.,& Vasiljević, N.. (2017). The failure of planning endevour in north east border area of Serbia towards Bulgaria. in 3rd International Scientific Conference Geobalcanica 2017, 95-102.
https://doi.org/10.18509/GBP.2017.13
conv_1428

Đorđević D, Vasiljević N. The failure of planning endevour in north east border area of Serbia towards Bulgaria. in 3rd International Scientific Conference Geobalcanica 2017. 2017;:95-102.
doi:10.18509/GBP.2017.13
conv_1428 .

Đorđević, Dejan, Vasiljević, Nevena, "The failure of planning endevour in north east border area of Serbia towards Bulgaria" in 3rd International Scientific Conference Geobalcanica 2017 (2017):95-102,
https://doi.org/10.18509/GBP.2017.13 .,
conv_1428 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Dejan
AU  - Vasiljević, Nevena
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/687
AB  - Rad predstavlja seriju tzv. Kritičkih geografija, odnosno primera ekonomskih, ekoloških i socijalnih izazova sa prostornom dimenzijom, te prikaza neuspeha politika koje su na te izazove pokušale da odgovore usled zanemarivanja prostornog načina mišljenja. Zbog različitih razloga a pod svemoćnom senkom mondijalističkog koncepta, politike i odlučivanje retko obuhvataju posledice na način na koji koristimo zemljište i to na različitim mestima. Zanemarivanje mesta u geografskom smislu odnosno načina na koji politike imaju uticaj na konkretan prostor dovelo je do negativnih ekonomskih, socijalnih i ekoloških efekata. U radu su dati modaliteti u okviru kojih bi prostorni način mišljenja mogao bita inkorporiran u proces odlučivanja, sa posebnim osvrtom na razvoj prostornyh analitičkih karti za kreatore politika - jednu vrstu "GIS-a za političare". Mnogim zemljama nedostaju studije o prostornim posledicama ekonomskih i socijalnih politika i programa, te o uticaju njihove međusobne interakcije na ukupan razvoj države.
AB  - This paper presents a series of "critical geographies": examples of economic, environmental and social challenges with a spatial dimension, and the way that policy has failed to respond adequately to them with place and space in mind. Overshadowed by the globalization/mondialisation concept, for a variety of reasons, policy and decision making too rarely incorporate the implications of the ways we use the land and the consequences for different places. The neglect of place, in particular the way that different policies combine to affect places in different ways, has contributed to a range of negative economic, social and environmental outcomes. This paper makes some suggestions for ways in which spatial thinking can be advanced in policy and decision making. In particular, to advance a greater spatial intelligence, we need to develop central spatial analytical maps for policy-makers - a kind of "GIS for policy". Many countries lack single documents which provide an overarching framework about the spatial dimension of policies and programmes, and how they interact (including the unintended consequences) to affect the development of the country.
T2  - Glasnik - Geografsko društvo Republike Srpske
T1  - Misliti i delovati prostorno - mondijalizacija, kritička geografija i planiranje
T1  - Thinking and acting spatially: Globalization, critical geography and planning
EP  - 58
IS  - 19
SP  - 37
DO  - 10.7251/HER1915037DJ
UR  - conv_789
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Dejan and Vasiljević, Nevena",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Rad predstavlja seriju tzv. Kritičkih geografija, odnosno primera ekonomskih, ekoloških i socijalnih izazova sa prostornom dimenzijom, te prikaza neuspeha politika koje su na te izazove pokušale da odgovore usled zanemarivanja prostornog načina mišljenja. Zbog različitih razloga a pod svemoćnom senkom mondijalističkog koncepta, politike i odlučivanje retko obuhvataju posledice na način na koji koristimo zemljište i to na različitim mestima. Zanemarivanje mesta u geografskom smislu odnosno načina na koji politike imaju uticaj na konkretan prostor dovelo je do negativnih ekonomskih, socijalnih i ekoloških efekata. U radu su dati modaliteti u okviru kojih bi prostorni način mišljenja mogao bita inkorporiran u proces odlučivanja, sa posebnim osvrtom na razvoj prostornyh analitičkih karti za kreatore politika - jednu vrstu "GIS-a za političare". Mnogim zemljama nedostaju studije o prostornim posledicama ekonomskih i socijalnih politika i programa, te o uticaju njihove međusobne interakcije na ukupan razvoj države., This paper presents a series of "critical geographies": examples of economic, environmental and social challenges with a spatial dimension, and the way that policy has failed to respond adequately to them with place and space in mind. Overshadowed by the globalization/mondialisation concept, for a variety of reasons, policy and decision making too rarely incorporate the implications of the ways we use the land and the consequences for different places. The neglect of place, in particular the way that different policies combine to affect places in different ways, has contributed to a range of negative economic, social and environmental outcomes. This paper makes some suggestions for ways in which spatial thinking can be advanced in policy and decision making. In particular, to advance a greater spatial intelligence, we need to develop central spatial analytical maps for policy-makers - a kind of "GIS for policy". Many countries lack single documents which provide an overarching framework about the spatial dimension of policies and programmes, and how they interact (including the unintended consequences) to affect the development of the country.",
journal = "Glasnik - Geografsko društvo Republike Srpske",
title = "Misliti i delovati prostorno - mondijalizacija, kritička geografija i planiranje, Thinking and acting spatially: Globalization, critical geography and planning",
pages = "58-37",
number = "19",
doi = "10.7251/HER1915037DJ",
url = "conv_789"
}

Đorđević, D.,& Vasiljević, N.. (2015). Misliti i delovati prostorno - mondijalizacija, kritička geografija i planiranje. in Glasnik - Geografsko društvo Republike Srpske(19), 37-58.
https://doi.org/10.7251/HER1915037DJ
conv_789

Đorđević D, Vasiljević N. Misliti i delovati prostorno - mondijalizacija, kritička geografija i planiranje. in Glasnik - Geografsko društvo Republike Srpske. 2015;(19):37-58.
doi:10.7251/HER1915037DJ
conv_789 .

Đorđević, Dejan, Vasiljević, Nevena, "Misliti i delovati prostorno - mondijalizacija, kritička geografija i planiranje" in Glasnik - Geografsko društvo Republike Srpske, no. 19 (2015):37-58,
https://doi.org/10.7251/HER1915037DJ .,
conv_789 .