TY  - JOUR
AU  - Balacenoiu, Flavius
AU  - Japelj, Anze
AU  - Bernardinelli, Iris
AU  - Castagneyrol, Bastien
AU  - Csoka, Gyorgy
AU  - Glavendekić, Milka
AU  - Hoch, Gernot
AU  - Hrasovec, Boris
AU  - Krajter Ostoić, Silvija
AU  - Paulin, Marton
AU  - Williams, David
AU  - Witters, Johan
AU  - de Groot, Maarten
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1432
AB  - Against the background of the phenomenon of globalisation, which has increasingly intensified in recent decades, invasive alien species (IAS) have led to biological invasions that have resulted in multiple negative effects on economies, human health, and especially on the environment. In order to control invasive alien species, preventive actions are considered the most effective methods. In this context, society can actively participate in the process of early detection and preventing the spread of these organisms, but there is a need to raise public awareness. In order for this process to take place in the most efficient way, it is necessary to initially evaluate the knowledge of the general public to IAS. Through a questionnaire that was circulated in ten European countries and had over two thousand respondents, this study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge of some stakeholders in the forestry sector regarding IAS. The results showed that a vast majority of respondents who participated in the study had heard about IAS and provided a correct definition of these organisms. Most of the respondents in this study heard for the first time about IAS from school, the Internet, or journal articles. Data analysis also showed that stakeholders in the forestry sector (foresters, forest owners, and members of environmental NGOs) were more likely than the other respondents to be aware of the impact of IAS. The results of this study offer an insight to researchers and decision makers assessing the differences of opinion regarding invasive alien species, and the necessary steps that could be adopted in the process of raising awareness in society.
T2  - Land
T1  - Ascertaining the Knowledge of the General Public and Stakeholders in the Forestry Sector to Invasive Alien Species-A Pan-European Study
IS  - 3
VL  - 12
DO  - 10.3390/land12030642
UR  - conv_1693
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Balacenoiu, Flavius and Japelj, Anze and Bernardinelli, Iris and Castagneyrol, Bastien and Csoka, Gyorgy and Glavendekić, Milka and Hoch, Gernot and Hrasovec, Boris and Krajter Ostoić, Silvija and Paulin, Marton and Williams, David and Witters, Johan and de Groot, Maarten",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Against the background of the phenomenon of globalisation, which has increasingly intensified in recent decades, invasive alien species (IAS) have led to biological invasions that have resulted in multiple negative effects on economies, human health, and especially on the environment. In order to control invasive alien species, preventive actions are considered the most effective methods. In this context, society can actively participate in the process of early detection and preventing the spread of these organisms, but there is a need to raise public awareness. In order for this process to take place in the most efficient way, it is necessary to initially evaluate the knowledge of the general public to IAS. Through a questionnaire that was circulated in ten European countries and had over two thousand respondents, this study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge of some stakeholders in the forestry sector regarding IAS. The results showed that a vast majority of respondents who participated in the study had heard about IAS and provided a correct definition of these organisms. Most of the respondents in this study heard for the first time about IAS from school, the Internet, or journal articles. Data analysis also showed that stakeholders in the forestry sector (foresters, forest owners, and members of environmental NGOs) were more likely than the other respondents to be aware of the impact of IAS. The results of this study offer an insight to researchers and decision makers assessing the differences of opinion regarding invasive alien species, and the necessary steps that could be adopted in the process of raising awareness in society.",
journal = "Land",
title = "Ascertaining the Knowledge of the General Public and Stakeholders in the Forestry Sector to Invasive Alien Species-A Pan-European Study",
number = "3",
volume = "12",
doi = "10.3390/land12030642",
url = "conv_1693"
}

Balacenoiu, F., Japelj, A., Bernardinelli, I., Castagneyrol, B., Csoka, G., Glavendekić, M., Hoch, G., Hrasovec, B., Krajter Ostoić, S., Paulin, M., Williams, D., Witters, J.,& de Groot, M.. (2023). Ascertaining the Knowledge of the General Public and Stakeholders in the Forestry Sector to Invasive Alien Species-A Pan-European Study. in Land, 12(3).
https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030642
conv_1693

Balacenoiu F, Japelj A, Bernardinelli I, Castagneyrol B, Csoka G, Glavendekić M, Hoch G, Hrasovec B, Krajter Ostoić S, Paulin M, Williams D, Witters J, de Groot M. Ascertaining the Knowledge of the General Public and Stakeholders in the Forestry Sector to Invasive Alien Species-A Pan-European Study. in Land. 2023;12(3).
doi:10.3390/land12030642
conv_1693 .

Balacenoiu, Flavius, Japelj, Anze, Bernardinelli, Iris, Castagneyrol, Bastien, Csoka, Gyorgy, Glavendekić, Milka, Hoch, Gernot, Hrasovec, Boris, Krajter Ostoić, Silvija, Paulin, Marton, Williams, David, Witters, Johan, de Groot, Maarten, "Ascertaining the Knowledge of the General Public and Stakeholders in the Forestry Sector to Invasive Alien Species-A Pan-European Study" in Land, 12, no. 3 (2023),
https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030642 .,
conv_1693 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Balacenoiu, Flavius
AU  - Japelj, Anze
AU  - Bernardinelli, Iris
AU  - Castagneyrol, Bastien
AU  - Csoka, Gyorgy
AU  - Glavendekić, Milka
AU  - Hoch, Gernot
AU  - Hrasovec, Boris
AU  - Krajter Ostoić, Silvija
AU  - Paulin, Marton
AU  - Williams, David
AU  - Witters, Johan
AU  - de Groot, Maarten
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1204
AB  - The oak lace bug (OLB) Corythucha arcuata (Say, 1832) is an invasive alien species (IAS) that potentially could have many negative impacts on European oak health. Certain measures can be applied to counteract these effects. However, these measures may not be acceptable for forest managers or other stakeholder groups, such as private forest owners, environmental NGOs or the general public. Thereby, we set out to study the perception and knowledge of foresters and other stakeholders on the health status of European oak forests affected by oak lace bug and to investigate what forest health management measures would be acceptable to these target groups. An online survey questionnaire was designed and distributed via social networks, as well as professional networks via e-mails. The survey questionnaire was completed by 2084 respondents from nine European countries: Austria, Croatia, Belgium, France, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia. Even though only a little over 60% of respondents reported they had noticed the discolouration of oak leaves caused by OLB, almost all (93%) considered it to be a problem. As respond-ents come from a country where C. arcuata is widespread and established, people's general knowledge and awareness of OLB began to increase. The survey revealed that foresters thought that the insect affected photosynthesis, acorn crop and the aesthetics of the trees, but cannot cause death of trees. However, they assume that the value of the wood would decrease (this fact is also supported by the respondents who are connected to an environmental NGO), but that OLB does not affect property value. However, forest owners claim that the value of the property can be affected and that people would avoid entering the for-est. In terms of potential control methods, respondents preferred biological or mechanical measures over chemical ones. We consider this study to be a good basis for further research on the topic of perception, knowledge and attitudes related to OLB since we can expect that the IAS, such as OLB, will certainly spread to European countries that were not included in this survey.
T2  - Neobiota
T1  - Corythucha arcuata (Say, 1832) (Hemiptera, Tingidae) in its invasive range in Europe: perception, knowledge and willingness to act in foresters and citizens
EP  - 153
SP  - 133
VL  - 69
DO  - 10.3897/neobiota.69.71851
UR  - conv_1584
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Balacenoiu, Flavius and Japelj, Anze and Bernardinelli, Iris and Castagneyrol, Bastien and Csoka, Gyorgy and Glavendekić, Milka and Hoch, Gernot and Hrasovec, Boris and Krajter Ostoić, Silvija and Paulin, Marton and Williams, David and Witters, Johan and de Groot, Maarten",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The oak lace bug (OLB) Corythucha arcuata (Say, 1832) is an invasive alien species (IAS) that potentially could have many negative impacts on European oak health. Certain measures can be applied to counteract these effects. However, these measures may not be acceptable for forest managers or other stakeholder groups, such as private forest owners, environmental NGOs or the general public. Thereby, we set out to study the perception and knowledge of foresters and other stakeholders on the health status of European oak forests affected by oak lace bug and to investigate what forest health management measures would be acceptable to these target groups. An online survey questionnaire was designed and distributed via social networks, as well as professional networks via e-mails. The survey questionnaire was completed by 2084 respondents from nine European countries: Austria, Croatia, Belgium, France, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia. Even though only a little over 60% of respondents reported they had noticed the discolouration of oak leaves caused by OLB, almost all (93%) considered it to be a problem. As respond-ents come from a country where C. arcuata is widespread and established, people's general knowledge and awareness of OLB began to increase. The survey revealed that foresters thought that the insect affected photosynthesis, acorn crop and the aesthetics of the trees, but cannot cause death of trees. However, they assume that the value of the wood would decrease (this fact is also supported by the respondents who are connected to an environmental NGO), but that OLB does not affect property value. However, forest owners claim that the value of the property can be affected and that people would avoid entering the for-est. In terms of potential control methods, respondents preferred biological or mechanical measures over chemical ones. We consider this study to be a good basis for further research on the topic of perception, knowledge and attitudes related to OLB since we can expect that the IAS, such as OLB, will certainly spread to European countries that were not included in this survey.",
journal = "Neobiota",
title = "Corythucha arcuata (Say, 1832) (Hemiptera, Tingidae) in its invasive range in Europe: perception, knowledge and willingness to act in foresters and citizens",
pages = "153-133",
volume = "69",
doi = "10.3897/neobiota.69.71851",
url = "conv_1584"
}

Balacenoiu, F., Japelj, A., Bernardinelli, I., Castagneyrol, B., Csoka, G., Glavendekić, M., Hoch, G., Hrasovec, B., Krajter Ostoić, S., Paulin, M., Williams, D., Witters, J.,& de Groot, M.. (2021). Corythucha arcuata (Say, 1832) (Hemiptera, Tingidae) in its invasive range in Europe: perception, knowledge and willingness to act in foresters and citizens. in Neobiota, 69, 133-153.
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.69.71851
conv_1584

Balacenoiu F, Japelj A, Bernardinelli I, Castagneyrol B, Csoka G, Glavendekić M, Hoch G, Hrasovec B, Krajter Ostoić S, Paulin M, Williams D, Witters J, de Groot M. Corythucha arcuata (Say, 1832) (Hemiptera, Tingidae) in its invasive range in Europe: perception, knowledge and willingness to act in foresters and citizens. in Neobiota. 2021;69:133-153.
doi:10.3897/neobiota.69.71851
conv_1584 .

Balacenoiu, Flavius, Japelj, Anze, Bernardinelli, Iris, Castagneyrol, Bastien, Csoka, Gyorgy, Glavendekić, Milka, Hoch, Gernot, Hrasovec, Boris, Krajter Ostoić, Silvija, Paulin, Marton, Williams, David, Witters, Johan, de Groot, Maarten, "Corythucha arcuata (Say, 1832) (Hemiptera, Tingidae) in its invasive range in Europe: perception, knowledge and willingness to act in foresters and citizens" in Neobiota, 69 (2021):133-153,
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.69.71851 .,
conv_1584 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vuletić, Dijana
AU  - Krajter Ostoić, Silvija
AU  - Keča, Ljiljana
AU  - Avdibegović, Mersudin
AU  - Potočki, Kristina
AU  - Posavec, Stjepan
AU  - Marković, Aleksandar
AU  - Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1157
AB  - This paper examines the level of payment for ecosystem services (PES) concept implementation in the financing of water-related forest ecosystem services (ES) in the Republic of Croatia, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FB&H), the Republic of Slovenia, and the Republic of Serbia. The focus is on water-related forest ES recognised by the millennium ecosystem assessment (MEA). For the purpose of this paper, the termpure PESdescribes schemes that comply to all five conditions set by Wunder definition and termPES likefor those schemes that miss some of those conditions. In the first step, the most important legislative documents related to forests, water, and environmental protection were selected. The second consists of a content analysis; focusing on the definition of ES; the definition of fees or payments; the establishment of 'forest funds', 'water funds', or 'environmental funds'; and the way these funds were spent. Here we looked at the flow of funding into the forestry sector recognising forest management as the main water-related forest ES provider. Research revealed existence of well-established payments schemes in forestry in Croatia for almost 30 years and in FB&H for some 20 years which were assessed as closest topure PES. In Serbia and Slovenia, there were no PES orPES likeschemes in the forestry sector. In the water sector the well-establishedPES likepayments schemes existing in all four countries. The environmental protection sector, however, rely more on thetax likerather than on thePES likeschemes. Legislation in general recognised the link between forests and water, but this was much more evident in the forestry than in the water or environment sector. The role of the state is strongly pronounced in all countries studied, and was the main driving force behind all payments. However, this position of the state represents also the main obstacle for the development ofpure PESschemes, together with underdeveloped private forestry and complex socio-economic conditions. Nevertheless, there is room for further development ofpure PESandPES likeschemes based on EU or global experiences.
T2  - Forests
T1  - Water-Related Payment Schemes for Forest Ecosystem Services in Selected Southeast European (SEE) Countries
IS  - 6
VL  - 11
DO  - 10.3390/f11060654
UR  - conv_1501
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vuletić, Dijana and Krajter Ostoić, Silvija and Keča, Ljiljana and Avdibegović, Mersudin and Potočki, Kristina and Posavec, Stjepan and Marković, Aleksandar and Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This paper examines the level of payment for ecosystem services (PES) concept implementation in the financing of water-related forest ecosystem services (ES) in the Republic of Croatia, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FB&H), the Republic of Slovenia, and the Republic of Serbia. The focus is on water-related forest ES recognised by the millennium ecosystem assessment (MEA). For the purpose of this paper, the termpure PESdescribes schemes that comply to all five conditions set by Wunder definition and termPES likefor those schemes that miss some of those conditions. In the first step, the most important legislative documents related to forests, water, and environmental protection were selected. The second consists of a content analysis; focusing on the definition of ES; the definition of fees or payments; the establishment of 'forest funds', 'water funds', or 'environmental funds'; and the way these funds were spent. Here we looked at the flow of funding into the forestry sector recognising forest management as the main water-related forest ES provider. Research revealed existence of well-established payments schemes in forestry in Croatia for almost 30 years and in FB&H for some 20 years which were assessed as closest topure PES. In Serbia and Slovenia, there were no PES orPES likeschemes in the forestry sector. In the water sector the well-establishedPES likepayments schemes existing in all four countries. The environmental protection sector, however, rely more on thetax likerather than on thePES likeschemes. Legislation in general recognised the link between forests and water, but this was much more evident in the forestry than in the water or environment sector. The role of the state is strongly pronounced in all countries studied, and was the main driving force behind all payments. However, this position of the state represents also the main obstacle for the development ofpure PESschemes, together with underdeveloped private forestry and complex socio-economic conditions. Nevertheless, there is room for further development ofpure PESandPES likeschemes based on EU or global experiences.",
journal = "Forests",
title = "Water-Related Payment Schemes for Forest Ecosystem Services in Selected Southeast European (SEE) Countries",
number = "6",
volume = "11",
doi = "10.3390/f11060654",
url = "conv_1501"
}

Vuletić, D., Krajter Ostoić, S., Keča, L., Avdibegović, M., Potočki, K., Posavec, S., Marković, A.,& Pezdevsek Malovrh, S.. (2020). Water-Related Payment Schemes for Forest Ecosystem Services in Selected Southeast European (SEE) Countries. in Forests, 11(6).
https://doi.org/10.3390/f11060654
conv_1501

Vuletić D, Krajter Ostoić S, Keča L, Avdibegović M, Potočki K, Posavec S, Marković A, Pezdevsek Malovrh S. Water-Related Payment Schemes for Forest Ecosystem Services in Selected Southeast European (SEE) Countries. in Forests. 2020;11(6).
doi:10.3390/f11060654
conv_1501 .

Vuletić, Dijana, Krajter Ostoić, Silvija, Keča, Ljiljana, Avdibegović, Mersudin, Potočki, Kristina, Posavec, Stjepan, Marković, Aleksandar, Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela, "Water-Related Payment Schemes for Forest Ecosystem Services in Selected Southeast European (SEE) Countries" in Forests, 11, no. 6 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.3390/f11060654 .,
conv_1501 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nichiforel, Liviu
AU  - Deuffić, Philippe
AU  - Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark
AU  - Weiss, Gerhard
AU  - Hujala, Teppo
AU  - Keary, Kevin
AU  - Lawrence, Anna
AU  - Avdibegović, Mersudin
AU  - Dobsinska, Zuzana
AU  - Feliciano, Diana
AU  - Gorriz-Mifsud, Elena
AU  - Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke
AU  - Hrib, Michal
AU  - Jarsky, Vilem
AU  - Jodlowski, Krzysztof
AU  - Lukmine, Diana
AU  - Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela
AU  - Nedeljković, Jelena
AU  - Nonić, Dragan
AU  - Krajter Ostoić, Silvija
AU  - Pukall, Klaus
AU  - Rondeux, Jacques
AU  - Samara, Theano
AU  - Sarvasova, Zuzana
AU  - Scriban, Ramona Elena
AU  - Silingiene, Rita
AU  - Sinko, Milan
AU  - Stojanovska, Makedonka
AU  - Stojanovski, Vladimir
AU  - Stoyanov, Todor
AU  - Teder, Meelis
AU  - Vennesland, Birger
AU  - Wilhelmsson, Erik
AU  - Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee
AU  - Živojinović, Ivana
AU  - Bouriaud, Laura
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1125
AB  - In the last two decades, attention on forests and ownership rights has increased in different domains of international policy, particularly in relation to achieving the global sustainable development goals. This paper looks at the changes in forest-specific legislation applicable to regular productive forests, across 28 European countries. We compare the legal framework applicable in the mid-1990s with that applicable in 2015, using the Property Rights Index in Forestry (PRIF) to measure changes across time and space. The paper shows that forest owners in most western European countries already had high decision-making power in the mid-1990s, following deregulation trends from the 1980s; and for the next two decades, distribution of rights remained largely stable. For these countries, the content and direction of changes indicate that the main pressure on forest-focused legislation comes from environmental discourses (e.g. biodiversity and climate change policies). In contrast, former socialist countries in the mid-1990s gave lower decision-making powers to forest owners than in any of the Western Europe countries; over the next 20 years these show remarkable changes in management, exclusion and withdrawal rights. As a result of these changes, there is no longer a clear line between western and former socialist countries with respect to the national governance systems used to address private forest ownership. Nevertheless, with the exception of Baltic countries which have moved towards the western forest governance system, most of the former socialist countries still maintain a state-centred approach in private forest management. Overall, most of the changes we identified in the last two decades across Europe were recorded in the categories of management rights and exclusion rights. These changes reflect the general trend in European forest policies to expand and reinforce the landowners' individual rights, while preserving minimal rights for other categories of forest users; and to promote the use of financial instruments when targeting policy goals related to the environmental discourse.
T2  - Forest Policy and Economics
T1  - Two decades of forest-related legislation changes in European countries analysed from a property rights perspective
VL  - 115
DO  - 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102146
UR  - conv_1490
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Nichiforel, Liviu and Deuffić, Philippe and Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark and Weiss, Gerhard and Hujala, Teppo and Keary, Kevin and Lawrence, Anna and Avdibegović, Mersudin and Dobsinska, Zuzana and Feliciano, Diana and Gorriz-Mifsud, Elena and Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke and Hrib, Michal and Jarsky, Vilem and Jodlowski, Krzysztof and Lukmine, Diana and Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela and Nedeljković, Jelena and Nonić, Dragan and Krajter Ostoić, Silvija and Pukall, Klaus and Rondeux, Jacques and Samara, Theano and Sarvasova, Zuzana and Scriban, Ramona Elena and Silingiene, Rita and Sinko, Milan and Stojanovska, Makedonka and Stojanovski, Vladimir and Stoyanov, Todor and Teder, Meelis and Vennesland, Birger and Wilhelmsson, Erik and Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee and Živojinović, Ivana and Bouriaud, Laura",
year = "2020",
abstract = "In the last two decades, attention on forests and ownership rights has increased in different domains of international policy, particularly in relation to achieving the global sustainable development goals. This paper looks at the changes in forest-specific legislation applicable to regular productive forests, across 28 European countries. We compare the legal framework applicable in the mid-1990s with that applicable in 2015, using the Property Rights Index in Forestry (PRIF) to measure changes across time and space. The paper shows that forest owners in most western European countries already had high decision-making power in the mid-1990s, following deregulation trends from the 1980s; and for the next two decades, distribution of rights remained largely stable. For these countries, the content and direction of changes indicate that the main pressure on forest-focused legislation comes from environmental discourses (e.g. biodiversity and climate change policies). In contrast, former socialist countries in the mid-1990s gave lower decision-making powers to forest owners than in any of the Western Europe countries; over the next 20 years these show remarkable changes in management, exclusion and withdrawal rights. As a result of these changes, there is no longer a clear line between western and former socialist countries with respect to the national governance systems used to address private forest ownership. Nevertheless, with the exception of Baltic countries which have moved towards the western forest governance system, most of the former socialist countries still maintain a state-centred approach in private forest management. Overall, most of the changes we identified in the last two decades across Europe were recorded in the categories of management rights and exclusion rights. These changes reflect the general trend in European forest policies to expand and reinforce the landowners' individual rights, while preserving minimal rights for other categories of forest users; and to promote the use of financial instruments when targeting policy goals related to the environmental discourse.",
journal = "Forest Policy and Economics",
title = "Two decades of forest-related legislation changes in European countries analysed from a property rights perspective",
volume = "115",
doi = "10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102146",
url = "conv_1490"
}

Nichiforel, L., Deuffić, P., Thorsen, B. J., Weiss, G., Hujala, T., Keary, K., Lawrence, A., Avdibegović, M., Dobsinska, Z., Feliciano, D., Gorriz-Mifsud, E., Hoogstra-Klein, M., Hrib, M., Jarsky, V., Jodlowski, K., Lukmine, D., Pezdevsek Malovrh, S., Nedeljković, J., Nonić, D., Krajter Ostoić, S., Pukall, K., Rondeux, J., Samara, T., Sarvasova, Z., Scriban, R. E., Silingiene, R., Sinko, M., Stojanovska, M., Stojanovski, V., Stoyanov, T., Teder, M., Vennesland, B., Wilhelmsson, E., Wilkes-Allemann, J., Živojinović, I.,& Bouriaud, L.. (2020). Two decades of forest-related legislation changes in European countries analysed from a property rights perspective. in Forest Policy and Economics, 115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102146
conv_1490

Nichiforel L, Deuffić P, Thorsen BJ, Weiss G, Hujala T, Keary K, Lawrence A, Avdibegović M, Dobsinska Z, Feliciano D, Gorriz-Mifsud E, Hoogstra-Klein M, Hrib M, Jarsky V, Jodlowski K, Lukmine D, Pezdevsek Malovrh S, Nedeljković J, Nonić D, Krajter Ostoić S, Pukall K, Rondeux J, Samara T, Sarvasova Z, Scriban RE, Silingiene R, Sinko M, Stojanovska M, Stojanovski V, Stoyanov T, Teder M, Vennesland B, Wilhelmsson E, Wilkes-Allemann J, Živojinović I, Bouriaud L. Two decades of forest-related legislation changes in European countries analysed from a property rights perspective. in Forest Policy and Economics. 2020;115.
doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102146
conv_1490 .

Nichiforel, Liviu, Deuffić, Philippe, Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, Weiss, Gerhard, Hujala, Teppo, Keary, Kevin, Lawrence, Anna, Avdibegović, Mersudin, Dobsinska, Zuzana, Feliciano, Diana, Gorriz-Mifsud, Elena, Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke, Hrib, Michal, Jarsky, Vilem, Jodlowski, Krzysztof, Lukmine, Diana, Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela, Nedeljković, Jelena, Nonić, Dragan, Krajter Ostoić, Silvija, Pukall, Klaus, Rondeux, Jacques, Samara, Theano, Sarvasova, Zuzana, Scriban, Ramona Elena, Silingiene, Rita, Sinko, Milan, Stojanovska, Makedonka, Stojanovski, Vladimir, Stoyanov, Todor, Teder, Meelis, Vennesland, Birger, Wilhelmsson, Erik, Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee, Živojinović, Ivana, Bouriaud, Laura, "Two decades of forest-related legislation changes in European countries analysed from a property rights perspective" in Forest Policy and Economics, 115 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102146 .,
conv_1490 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nichiforel, Liviu
AU  - Keary, Kevin
AU  - Deuffić, Philippe
AU  - Weiss, Gerhard
AU  - Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark
AU  - Winkel, Georg
AU  - Avdibegović, Mersudin
AU  - Dobsinska, Zuzana
AU  - Feliciano, Diana
AU  - Gatto, Paola
AU  - Mifsud, Elena Gorriz
AU  - Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke
AU  - Hrib, Michal
AU  - Hujala, Teppo
AU  - Jager, Laszlo
AU  - Jarsky, Vilem
AU  - Jodlowski, Krzysztof
AU  - Lawrence, Anna
AU  - Lukmine, Diana
AU  - Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela
AU  - Nedeljković, Jelena
AU  - Nonić, Dragan
AU  - Krajter Ostoić, Silvija
AU  - Pukall, Klaus
AU  - Rondeux, Jacques
AU  - Samara, Theano
AU  - Sarvasova, Zuzana
AU  - Scriban, Ramona Elena
AU  - Silingiene, Rita
AU  - Sinko, Milan
AU  - Stojanovska, Makedonka
AU  - Stojanovski, Vladimir
AU  - Stoyanov, Nickola
AU  - Teder, Meelis
AU  - Vennesland, Birger
AU  - Vilkriste, Lelde
AU  - Wilhelmsson, Erik
AU  - Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee
AU  - Bouriaud, Laura
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/914
AB  - Private forests are widespread in Europe providing a range of ecosystem services of significant value to society, and there are calls for novel policies to enhance their provision and to face the challenges of environmental changes. Such policies need to acknowledge the importance of private forests, and importantly they need to be based on a deep understanding of how property rights held by private forest owners vary across Europe. We collected and analysed data on the content of property rights based on formal legal requirements existing in 31 European jurisdictions. To allow a comparison across jurisdictions, we constructed an original Property Rights Index for Forestry encompassing five rights domains (access, withdrawal, management, exclusion and alienation). We documented substantial variation of the private forest owners' rights, and notably to i) make decisions in operational management and the formulation of management goals, ii) withdraw timber resources from their forest, and iii) exclude others from the use of forest resources. We identified broad relations between the scope for decision making of private forest owners and jurisdictions' former socio-political background and geographical distribution. The variation in the content of property rights has implications for the implementation of international environmental policies, and stresses the need for tailored policy instruments, when addressing European society's rural development, the bioeconomy, climate change mitigation measures and nature protection strategies.
T2  - Land Use Policy
T1  - How private are Europe's private forests? A comparative property rights analysis
EP  - 552
SP  - 535
VL  - 76
DO  - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.034
UR  - conv_1349
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Nichiforel, Liviu and Keary, Kevin and Deuffić, Philippe and Weiss, Gerhard and Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark and Winkel, Georg and Avdibegović, Mersudin and Dobsinska, Zuzana and Feliciano, Diana and Gatto, Paola and Mifsud, Elena Gorriz and Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke and Hrib, Michal and Hujala, Teppo and Jager, Laszlo and Jarsky, Vilem and Jodlowski, Krzysztof and Lawrence, Anna and Lukmine, Diana and Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela and Nedeljković, Jelena and Nonić, Dragan and Krajter Ostoić, Silvija and Pukall, Klaus and Rondeux, Jacques and Samara, Theano and Sarvasova, Zuzana and Scriban, Ramona Elena and Silingiene, Rita and Sinko, Milan and Stojanovska, Makedonka and Stojanovski, Vladimir and Stoyanov, Nickola and Teder, Meelis and Vennesland, Birger and Vilkriste, Lelde and Wilhelmsson, Erik and Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee and Bouriaud, Laura",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Private forests are widespread in Europe providing a range of ecosystem services of significant value to society, and there are calls for novel policies to enhance their provision and to face the challenges of environmental changes. Such policies need to acknowledge the importance of private forests, and importantly they need to be based on a deep understanding of how property rights held by private forest owners vary across Europe. We collected and analysed data on the content of property rights based on formal legal requirements existing in 31 European jurisdictions. To allow a comparison across jurisdictions, we constructed an original Property Rights Index for Forestry encompassing five rights domains (access, withdrawal, management, exclusion and alienation). We documented substantial variation of the private forest owners' rights, and notably to i) make decisions in operational management and the formulation of management goals, ii) withdraw timber resources from their forest, and iii) exclude others from the use of forest resources. We identified broad relations between the scope for decision making of private forest owners and jurisdictions' former socio-political background and geographical distribution. The variation in the content of property rights has implications for the implementation of international environmental policies, and stresses the need for tailored policy instruments, when addressing European society's rural development, the bioeconomy, climate change mitigation measures and nature protection strategies.",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
title = "How private are Europe's private forests? A comparative property rights analysis",
pages = "552-535",
volume = "76",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.034",
url = "conv_1349"
}

Nichiforel, L., Keary, K., Deuffić, P., Weiss, G., Thorsen, B. J., Winkel, G., Avdibegović, M., Dobsinska, Z., Feliciano, D., Gatto, P., Mifsud, E. G., Hoogstra-Klein, M., Hrib, M., Hujala, T., Jager, L., Jarsky, V., Jodlowski, K., Lawrence, A., Lukmine, D., Pezdevsek Malovrh, S., Nedeljković, J., Nonić, D., Krajter Ostoić, S., Pukall, K., Rondeux, J., Samara, T., Sarvasova, Z., Scriban, R. E., Silingiene, R., Sinko, M., Stojanovska, M., Stojanovski, V., Stoyanov, N., Teder, M., Vennesland, B., Vilkriste, L., Wilhelmsson, E., Wilkes-Allemann, J.,& Bouriaud, L.. (2018). How private are Europe's private forests? A comparative property rights analysis. in Land Use Policy, 76, 535-552.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.034
conv_1349

Nichiforel L, Keary K, Deuffić P, Weiss G, Thorsen BJ, Winkel G, Avdibegović M, Dobsinska Z, Feliciano D, Gatto P, Mifsud EG, Hoogstra-Klein M, Hrib M, Hujala T, Jager L, Jarsky V, Jodlowski K, Lawrence A, Lukmine D, Pezdevsek Malovrh S, Nedeljković J, Nonić D, Krajter Ostoić S, Pukall K, Rondeux J, Samara T, Sarvasova Z, Scriban RE, Silingiene R, Sinko M, Stojanovska M, Stojanovski V, Stoyanov N, Teder M, Vennesland B, Vilkriste L, Wilhelmsson E, Wilkes-Allemann J, Bouriaud L. How private are Europe's private forests? A comparative property rights analysis. in Land Use Policy. 2018;76:535-552.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.034
conv_1349 .

Nichiforel, Liviu, Keary, Kevin, Deuffić, Philippe, Weiss, Gerhard, Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, Winkel, Georg, Avdibegović, Mersudin, Dobsinska, Zuzana, Feliciano, Diana, Gatto, Paola, Mifsud, Elena Gorriz, Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke, Hrib, Michal, Hujala, Teppo, Jager, Laszlo, Jarsky, Vilem, Jodlowski, Krzysztof, Lawrence, Anna, Lukmine, Diana, Pezdevsek Malovrh, Spela, Nedeljković, Jelena, Nonić, Dragan, Krajter Ostoić, Silvija, Pukall, Klaus, Rondeux, Jacques, Samara, Theano, Sarvasova, Zuzana, Scriban, Ramona Elena, Silingiene, Rita, Sinko, Milan, Stojanovska, Makedonka, Stojanovski, Vladimir, Stoyanov, Nickola, Teder, Meelis, Vennesland, Birger, Vilkriste, Lelde, Wilhelmsson, Erik, Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee, Bouriaud, Laura, "How private are Europe's private forests? A comparative property rights analysis" in Land Use Policy, 76 (2018):535-552,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.034 .,
conv_1349 .