TY  - JOUR
AU  - Simić, Snežana
AU  - Santric Milicević, Milena
AU  - Matejić, Bojana
AU  - Marinković, Jelena
AU  - Adams, Orvill
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/332
AB  - Objective: To provide insight of national activities and international assistance in PHC reform and to assess their effects on technical and allocative efficiency as well as financial sustainability of primary health care in the Republic of Serbia. Materials and methods: Analytical framework of the study consisted of gathering and reviewing of relevant political documents, international assistance project documentation, and analysis of routinely collected national statistical data based on the evaluation model of three groups of criteria: allocative, technical efficiency and financial sustainability in the public sector of Serbia from 2000 to 2007. Time trends were analyzed by Poisson regression models using average annual percentage changes - AAPC, and the percent of targeted change achieved by progress quotient - PQ. Results: Allocative efficiency of the PHC during period of 8 years was improved, but technical efficiency was almost unchanged for all service, except for preschool health care. Financial sustainability was also improved measured by indirect indicators of health expenditure. Conclusions: Results of this study indicated that we are on the right track with PHC reform, and international support is in accordance with the reform goals. Our approach has been and will remain incremental, gradualist and multi-faceted.
T2  - Health Policy
T1  - Do we have primary health care reform? The story of the Republic of Serbia
EP  - 169
IS  - 2
SP  - 160
VL  - 96
DO  - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.015
UR  - conv_911
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Simić, Snežana and Santric Milicević, Milena and Matejić, Bojana and Marinković, Jelena and Adams, Orvill",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Objective: To provide insight of national activities and international assistance in PHC reform and to assess their effects on technical and allocative efficiency as well as financial sustainability of primary health care in the Republic of Serbia. Materials and methods: Analytical framework of the study consisted of gathering and reviewing of relevant political documents, international assistance project documentation, and analysis of routinely collected national statistical data based on the evaluation model of three groups of criteria: allocative, technical efficiency and financial sustainability in the public sector of Serbia from 2000 to 2007. Time trends were analyzed by Poisson regression models using average annual percentage changes - AAPC, and the percent of targeted change achieved by progress quotient - PQ. Results: Allocative efficiency of the PHC during period of 8 years was improved, but technical efficiency was almost unchanged for all service, except for preschool health care. Financial sustainability was also improved measured by indirect indicators of health expenditure. Conclusions: Results of this study indicated that we are on the right track with PHC reform, and international support is in accordance with the reform goals. Our approach has been and will remain incremental, gradualist and multi-faceted.",
journal = "Health Policy",
title = "Do we have primary health care reform? The story of the Republic of Serbia",
pages = "169-160",
number = "2",
volume = "96",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.015",
url = "conv_911"
}

Simić, S., Santric Milicević, M., Matejić, B., Marinković, J.,& Adams, O.. (2010). Do we have primary health care reform? The story of the Republic of Serbia. in Health Policy, 96(2), 160-169.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.015
conv_911

Simić S, Santric Milicević M, Matejić B, Marinković J, Adams O. Do we have primary health care reform? The story of the Republic of Serbia. in Health Policy. 2010;96(2):160-169.
doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.015
conv_911 .

Simić, Snežana, Santric Milicević, Milena, Matejić, Bojana, Marinković, Jelena, Adams, Orvill, "Do we have primary health care reform? The story of the Republic of Serbia" in Health Policy, 96, no. 2 (2010):160-169,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.015 .,
conv_911 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Simić, Snežana
AU  - Marinković, Jelena
AU  - Santric Milicević, Milena
AU  - Milić, Natasa
AU  - Bjegović, Vesna
AU  - Kocev, Nikola
AU  - Janković, Slavenka
AU  - Vuković, Dejana
AU  - Laaser, Ulrich
AU  - Kirch, Wilhelm
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/295
AB  - Background Evaluation is a systematic process that facilitates measurement of the extent to which a student has attained the educational objective. Objectives The article objectives were to describe the teaching evaluation approach of the Master of Health Policy and Management program developed at Centre School of Public Health, the School of Medicine, Belgrade University. Methods The evaluation strategy for the Master of Health Policy and Management program (which has not been completed yet) for four obligatory courses involves two simple components: evaluation of student performance and student evaluation of the teaching process. The teaching evaluation was based on a questionnaire with a total of 11 questions. External evaluation was conducted by an individual expert who visited one course. Results The average final score for four courses was very high, somewhat higher than 86 points (of a maximum of 100) with a standard deviation of 9.76 points. However, the average final score per course differed significantly (F=6.46, p=0.001). Overall the average student's rating by questionnaire of all courses was 4.38 (of a maximum of 5), whereas the average marks for assessment of the specific characteristics of the course ranged from 3.65 (understandable teaching material and handouts) to 4.68 (the level of preparation by lecturers/instructors). Specific courses differed significantly in the overall rating (F=10.81, p=0.000). Conclusion The average rating of teachers and instructors was high, as was the average final score of students. However, students rated teaching slightly better than teachers evaluated their knowledge and skills.
T2  - Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg
T1  - Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University
EP  - 296
IS  - 3
SP  - 289
VL  - 18
DO  - 10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3
UR  - conv_843
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Simić, Snežana and Marinković, Jelena and Santric Milicević, Milena and Milić, Natasa and Bjegović, Vesna and Kocev, Nikola and Janković, Slavenka and Vuković, Dejana and Laaser, Ulrich and Kirch, Wilhelm",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Background Evaluation is a systematic process that facilitates measurement of the extent to which a student has attained the educational objective. Objectives The article objectives were to describe the teaching evaluation approach of the Master of Health Policy and Management program developed at Centre School of Public Health, the School of Medicine, Belgrade University. Methods The evaluation strategy for the Master of Health Policy and Management program (which has not been completed yet) for four obligatory courses involves two simple components: evaluation of student performance and student evaluation of the teaching process. The teaching evaluation was based on a questionnaire with a total of 11 questions. External evaluation was conducted by an individual expert who visited one course. Results The average final score for four courses was very high, somewhat higher than 86 points (of a maximum of 100) with a standard deviation of 9.76 points. However, the average final score per course differed significantly (F=6.46, p=0.001). Overall the average student's rating by questionnaire of all courses was 4.38 (of a maximum of 5), whereas the average marks for assessment of the specific characteristics of the course ranged from 3.65 (understandable teaching material and handouts) to 4.68 (the level of preparation by lecturers/instructors). Specific courses differed significantly in the overall rating (F=10.81, p=0.000). Conclusion The average rating of teachers and instructors was high, as was the average final score of students. However, students rated teaching slightly better than teachers evaluated their knowledge and skills.",
journal = "Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg",
title = "Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University",
pages = "296-289",
number = "3",
volume = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3",
url = "conv_843"
}

Simić, S., Marinković, J., Santric Milicević, M., Milić, N., Bjegović, V., Kocev, N., Janković, S., Vuković, D., Laaser, U.,& Kirch, W.. (2010). Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University. in Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg, 18(3), 289-296.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3
conv_843

Simić S, Marinković J, Santric Milicević M, Milić N, Bjegović V, Kocev N, Janković S, Vuković D, Laaser U, Kirch W. Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University. in Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg. 2010;18(3):289-296.
doi:10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3
conv_843 .

Simić, Snežana, Marinković, Jelena, Santric Milicević, Milena, Milić, Natasa, Bjegović, Vesna, Kocev, Nikola, Janković, Slavenka, Vuković, Dejana, Laaser, Ulrich, Kirch, Wilhelm, "Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University" in Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg, 18, no. 3 (2010):289-296,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3 .,
conv_843 .