TY  - JOUR
AU  - Simić, Snežana
AU  - Marinković, Jelena
AU  - Santric Milicević, Milena
AU  - Milić, Natasa
AU  - Bjegović, Vesna
AU  - Kocev, Nikola
AU  - Janković, Slavenka
AU  - Vuković, Dejana
AU  - Laaser, Ulrich
AU  - Kirch, Wilhelm
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/295
AB  - Background Evaluation is a systematic process that facilitates measurement of the extent to which a student has attained the educational objective. Objectives The article objectives were to describe the teaching evaluation approach of the Master of Health Policy and Management program developed at Centre School of Public Health, the School of Medicine, Belgrade University. Methods The evaluation strategy for the Master of Health Policy and Management program (which has not been completed yet) for four obligatory courses involves two simple components: evaluation of student performance and student evaluation of the teaching process. The teaching evaluation was based on a questionnaire with a total of 11 questions. External evaluation was conducted by an individual expert who visited one course. Results The average final score for four courses was very high, somewhat higher than 86 points (of a maximum of 100) with a standard deviation of 9.76 points. However, the average final score per course differed significantly (F=6.46, p=0.001). Overall the average student's rating by questionnaire of all courses was 4.38 (of a maximum of 5), whereas the average marks for assessment of the specific characteristics of the course ranged from 3.65 (understandable teaching material and handouts) to 4.68 (the level of preparation by lecturers/instructors). Specific courses differed significantly in the overall rating (F=10.81, p=0.000). Conclusion The average rating of teachers and instructors was high, as was the average final score of students. However, students rated teaching slightly better than teachers evaluated their knowledge and skills.
T2  - Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg
T1  - Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University
EP  - 296
IS  - 3
SP  - 289
VL  - 18
DO  - 10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3
UR  - conv_843
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Simić, Snežana and Marinković, Jelena and Santric Milicević, Milena and Milić, Natasa and Bjegović, Vesna and Kocev, Nikola and Janković, Slavenka and Vuković, Dejana and Laaser, Ulrich and Kirch, Wilhelm",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Background Evaluation is a systematic process that facilitates measurement of the extent to which a student has attained the educational objective. Objectives The article objectives were to describe the teaching evaluation approach of the Master of Health Policy and Management program developed at Centre School of Public Health, the School of Medicine, Belgrade University. Methods The evaluation strategy for the Master of Health Policy and Management program (which has not been completed yet) for four obligatory courses involves two simple components: evaluation of student performance and student evaluation of the teaching process. The teaching evaluation was based on a questionnaire with a total of 11 questions. External evaluation was conducted by an individual expert who visited one course. Results The average final score for four courses was very high, somewhat higher than 86 points (of a maximum of 100) with a standard deviation of 9.76 points. However, the average final score per course differed significantly (F=6.46, p=0.001). Overall the average student's rating by questionnaire of all courses was 4.38 (of a maximum of 5), whereas the average marks for assessment of the specific characteristics of the course ranged from 3.65 (understandable teaching material and handouts) to 4.68 (the level of preparation by lecturers/instructors). Specific courses differed significantly in the overall rating (F=10.81, p=0.000). Conclusion The average rating of teachers and instructors was high, as was the average final score of students. However, students rated teaching slightly better than teachers evaluated their knowledge and skills.",
journal = "Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg",
title = "Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University",
pages = "296-289",
number = "3",
volume = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3",
url = "conv_843"
}

Simić, S., Marinković, J., Santric Milicević, M., Milić, N., Bjegović, V., Kocev, N., Janković, S., Vuković, D., Laaser, U.,& Kirch, W.. (2010). Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University. in Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg, 18(3), 289-296.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3
conv_843

Simić S, Marinković J, Santric Milicević M, Milić N, Bjegović V, Kocev N, Janković S, Vuković D, Laaser U, Kirch W. Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University. in Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg. 2010;18(3):289-296.
doi:10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3
conv_843 .

Simić, Snežana, Marinković, Jelena, Santric Milicević, Milena, Milić, Natasa, Bjegović, Vesna, Kocev, Nikola, Janković, Slavenka, Vuković, Dejana, Laaser, Ulrich, Kirch, Wilhelm, "Teaching evaluation of the Master of Health Policy and Management program at the Centre School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Belgrade University" in Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg, 18, no. 3 (2010):289-296,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0312-3 .,
conv_843 .