Local livelihoods and land users' perceptions of land degradation in northwest Tunisia
Само за регистроване кориснике
2020
Аутори
Jendoubi, DoniaHossain, Md Sarwar
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3e38/d3e38f76e544ae3468626ca38c66287962b3d224" alt=""
Giger, Markus
Tomićević-Dubljević, Jelena
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3e38/d3e38f76e544ae3468626ca38c66287962b3d224" alt=""
Ouessar, Mohamed
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3e38/d3e38f76e544ae3468626ca38c66287962b3d224" alt=""
Liniger, Hanspeter
Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3e38/d3e38f76e544ae3468626ca38c66287962b3d224" alt=""
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Understanding land users' livelihoods and their strategies is essential in order to adapt prevention and adaptation policies and to ensure sustainable land management (SLM) planning. Considering the global call for SLM, and due to a lack of studies on land degradation (LD) in Tunisia, we aimed to explore the livelihoods of farmers, their livelihoods strategies and perceptions about LD and land management, in order to design SLM in rural areas in Tunisia. We used the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA) to analyse the livelihoods assets, livelihoods strategies, and the perceptions of people about LD and SLM. Through structured interviews with 90 households, we collected both quantitative and qualitative data on household assets, strategies, and perceptions. Results indicate variation in the status of livelihoods among households, which influences their livelihoods strategies and consequently livelihoods outcomes. When facing environmental issues, farm households apply various liveliho...ods strategies to shield themselves from negative impacts and shocks. Our study revealed that farmers in the high-livelihoods-assets category chose economic returns over environmental benefits. Farmers in the low-livelihoods-assets category have generated livelihoods strategies that lead to inappropriate management strategies due to low access to assets and, as a result, contributed to LD. This is because these farmers are more concerned about the immediate constraints of their livelihoods and subsistence than the medium and long-term sustainable land management. Compared to the other two groups, farmers in the medium-livelihoods assets category have the best perceptions and flexibility for SLM compared to the other two categories. Thus, as the quality of land is highly dependent on the way it is managed, environmental and land management planning, and policies should not only consider the rehabilitation of land but also require a better understanding of the livelihoods, strategies and perceptions of people as these remain key drivers that affect land condition.
Кључне речи:
Sustainable livelihoods approach / Sustainable land management / Perceptions / Livelihoods / Land degradation / AssetsИзвор:
Environmental Development, 2020, 33Финансирање / пројекти:
- Islamic Development Bank [78/TUN/P34]
- Swiss Federal Commission for Scholarships for Foreign Students [2014.0968/Tunesien/OP]
DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100507
ISSN: 2211-4645
WoS: 000520030200017
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85080897450
Институција/група
Šumarski fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Jendoubi, Donia AU - Hossain, Md Sarwar AU - Giger, Markus AU - Tomićević-Dubljević, Jelena AU - Ouessar, Mohamed AU - Liniger, Hanspeter AU - Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika PY - 2020 UR - https://omorika.sfb.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1133 AB - Understanding land users' livelihoods and their strategies is essential in order to adapt prevention and adaptation policies and to ensure sustainable land management (SLM) planning. Considering the global call for SLM, and due to a lack of studies on land degradation (LD) in Tunisia, we aimed to explore the livelihoods of farmers, their livelihoods strategies and perceptions about LD and land management, in order to design SLM in rural areas in Tunisia. We used the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA) to analyse the livelihoods assets, livelihoods strategies, and the perceptions of people about LD and SLM. Through structured interviews with 90 households, we collected both quantitative and qualitative data on household assets, strategies, and perceptions. Results indicate variation in the status of livelihoods among households, which influences their livelihoods strategies and consequently livelihoods outcomes. When facing environmental issues, farm households apply various livelihoods strategies to shield themselves from negative impacts and shocks. Our study revealed that farmers in the high-livelihoods-assets category chose economic returns over environmental benefits. Farmers in the low-livelihoods-assets category have generated livelihoods strategies that lead to inappropriate management strategies due to low access to assets and, as a result, contributed to LD. This is because these farmers are more concerned about the immediate constraints of their livelihoods and subsistence than the medium and long-term sustainable land management. Compared to the other two groups, farmers in the medium-livelihoods assets category have the best perceptions and flexibility for SLM compared to the other two categories. Thus, as the quality of land is highly dependent on the way it is managed, environmental and land management planning, and policies should not only consider the rehabilitation of land but also require a better understanding of the livelihoods, strategies and perceptions of people as these remain key drivers that affect land condition. T2 - Environmental Development T1 - Local livelihoods and land users' perceptions of land degradation in northwest Tunisia VL - 33 DO - 10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100507 UR - conv_1484 ER -
@article{ author = "Jendoubi, Donia and Hossain, Md Sarwar and Giger, Markus and Tomićević-Dubljević, Jelena and Ouessar, Mohamed and Liniger, Hanspeter and Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika", year = "2020", abstract = "Understanding land users' livelihoods and their strategies is essential in order to adapt prevention and adaptation policies and to ensure sustainable land management (SLM) planning. Considering the global call for SLM, and due to a lack of studies on land degradation (LD) in Tunisia, we aimed to explore the livelihoods of farmers, their livelihoods strategies and perceptions about LD and land management, in order to design SLM in rural areas in Tunisia. We used the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA) to analyse the livelihoods assets, livelihoods strategies, and the perceptions of people about LD and SLM. Through structured interviews with 90 households, we collected both quantitative and qualitative data on household assets, strategies, and perceptions. Results indicate variation in the status of livelihoods among households, which influences their livelihoods strategies and consequently livelihoods outcomes. When facing environmental issues, farm households apply various livelihoods strategies to shield themselves from negative impacts and shocks. Our study revealed that farmers in the high-livelihoods-assets category chose economic returns over environmental benefits. Farmers in the low-livelihoods-assets category have generated livelihoods strategies that lead to inappropriate management strategies due to low access to assets and, as a result, contributed to LD. This is because these farmers are more concerned about the immediate constraints of their livelihoods and subsistence than the medium and long-term sustainable land management. Compared to the other two groups, farmers in the medium-livelihoods assets category have the best perceptions and flexibility for SLM compared to the other two categories. Thus, as the quality of land is highly dependent on the way it is managed, environmental and land management planning, and policies should not only consider the rehabilitation of land but also require a better understanding of the livelihoods, strategies and perceptions of people as these remain key drivers that affect land condition.", journal = "Environmental Development", title = "Local livelihoods and land users' perceptions of land degradation in northwest Tunisia", volume = "33", doi = "10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100507", url = "conv_1484" }
Jendoubi, D., Hossain, M. S., Giger, M., Tomićević-Dubljević, J., Ouessar, M., Liniger, H.,& Speranza, C. I.. (2020). Local livelihoods and land users' perceptions of land degradation in northwest Tunisia. in Environmental Development, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100507 conv_1484
Jendoubi D, Hossain MS, Giger M, Tomićević-Dubljević J, Ouessar M, Liniger H, Speranza CI. Local livelihoods and land users' perceptions of land degradation in northwest Tunisia. in Environmental Development. 2020;33. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100507 conv_1484 .
Jendoubi, Donia, Hossain, Md Sarwar, Giger, Markus, Tomićević-Dubljević, Jelena, Ouessar, Mohamed, Liniger, Hanspeter, Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika, "Local livelihoods and land users' perceptions of land degradation in northwest Tunisia" in Environmental Development, 33 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100507 ., conv_1484 .